 |
|
Colin F. Poole |
| Title |
Professor |
| Division |
Analytical |
| Education |
B. Sc. , University of Leeds (United Kingdom), 1971
M. Sc. University of Bristol (United Kingdom), 1972
Ph. D. University of Keele (United Kingdom), 1975
D. Sc. University of Leeds (United Kingdom) 1997
|
| Office |
363 LS |
| Phone |
(313)577-2881 |
| E-Mail |
|
|
Our research interests are in the field of separation science, trace organic analysis, and computer-
aided approaches to data analysis. In particular the application of gas, liquid, supercritical
fluid, and thin layer chromatographic techniques to problems of an environmental, industrial
and biomedical nature.
To support these areas we design and synthesize novel stationary phases; evaluate and formulate
solvent interactions using chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques; construct models
and optimize separations by computer-aided simulations; and design and construct small
devices to be added to existing equipment to enhance their analytical utility. Graduate students
in my group are exposed to a wide range of modern instrumental and chemical techniques
on a frequently changing basis.
A significant proportion of our recent work has employed the solvation parameter model to
study solvent-dependent behavior in chromatography. Initially the model was used to characterize
the solvent properties of gas chromatographic stationary phases and
more recently to predict breakthrough volumes in solid-phase extraction, to
model retention in reversed-phase liquid chromatography, and to characterize
surfactant properties in micellar electrokinetic chromatography. The same
approach was found successful in explaining the aquatic non-specific toxicity
of organic compounds to fish and bacteria and the uptake of organic compounds
from water by soil. These studies provide a bridge between biopartitioning
and surrogate chromatographic models suitable for their emulation.
As liquid chromatographic methods have matured, most of our research in
this area has moved from instrumental development to methods development.
A structure-driven approach to methods development is being pioneered
and has been successfully applied to solvent optimization in thin layer
and column liquid chromatography using computer generated retention
maps. Of fundamental significance, this approach has lead to new insight into
the retention process and has replaced a number of empirical observations
with a theoretical framework.
Chromatographic data can be very complex and difficult to interpret. Various
computer-aided chemometric methods are being used for data analysis and
the design of experiments using statistical techniques. These methods are
incorporated into our on-going research using real samples for the identification
of accelerants in suspect fires, to determine the botanical origin of flavors,
and in the determination of polar pesticides in foods.

REPRESENTATIVE PUBLICATIONS
C. F. Poole, The Essence of Chromatography,
Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003
C. F. Poole. Chromatographic and Spectroscopic
Methods for the Determination of Solvent
Properties of Room Temperature Ionic Liquids. J.
Chromatogr. A 1037 (2004) 49-82.
S. K. Poole, S. Patel, K. Dehring, H. Workman
and C. F. Poole. Determination of Acid
Dissociation Constants by Capillary
Electrophoresis, J. Chromatogr. A 1037 (2004)
445-454.
W. Kiridena, C. F. Poole and W. W. Koziol. The
Effect of Solvent Strength and Temperature on
Retention for a Polar-Endcapped,
Octadecylsiloxane-bonded Silica Stationary
Phase with Methanol-Water Mobile Phases. J.
Chromatogr. A 1060 (2004) 177-185.
C. F. Poole, H. Ahmed, W. Kiridena, C. DeKay
and W. W. Koziol. Contribution of Steric
Repulsion to Retention of an Octadecylsiloxane-
Bonded Silica Dtationary Phase in Reversed-
Phase Liquid Chromatography. Chromatographia
62 (2005) 553-561.
C. F. Poole, H. Ahmed, W. Kiridena, C. C.
Patchett and W. W. Koziol. Revised Solute
Descriptors for Characterizing Retention
Properties of Open-Tubular Columns in Gas
Chromatography and their Application to a
Carborane-Siloxane Copolymer Stationary Phase.
J. Chromatogr. A 1104 (2006) 299-312.
|